From ae24d9a8869c497537839f330384cbadb2cf687c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mitja Felicijan <mitja.felicijan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:17:43 +0100
Subject: Updated theme

---
 public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html')

diff --git a/public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html b/public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html
index bb91d0b..f630c7d 100755
--- a/public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html
+++ b/public/alacritty-open-links-with-modifier.html
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ file. Config file is located at <code>~/.config/alacritty/alacritty.yml</code>.<
 </span></span><span style=display:flex><span>      mods: Control
 </span></span></code></pre><p>The following should work under any Linux system. For macOS, you will need to
 change <code>command: xdg-open</code> to something else.<p>Now the links will be visible and clickable only when Control key is being
-pressed.<p>Source: <a href=https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/5246>https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/5246</a></div></article></main><section><hr><h2>Posts from blogs I follow around the net</h2><ul><li><a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ZFSWhyNotDirectoryToFilesystem target=_blank rel=noopener>One reason that ZFS can't turn a directory into a filesystem</a> — <a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/>Chris's Wiki :: blog</a><div>One of the wishes that I and other people frequently have for ZFS
-is the ability to take an existing directory (and everything
-underneath it) in a ZFS filesystem and turn it into a sub-filesystem
-of its own. One reason for wanting this is that a number of things
-are set and controlled on a per-filesyst…<li><a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html#28-10-2023 target=_blank rel=noopener>October 28, 2023</a> — <a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html>Rob Landley's Blog Thing for 2023</a><div>Oh good grief, two of my least favorite licensing people, Larry Rosen
+pressed.<p>Source: <a href=https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/5246>https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/5246</a></div></article></main><section><hr><h2>Posts from blogs I follow around the net</h2><ul><li><a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/NFSv4ServerLockClients target=_blank rel=noopener>Finding which NFSv4 client owns a lock on a Linux NFS(v4) server</a> — <a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/>Chris's Wiki :: blog</a><div>A while back I wrote an entry about finding which NFS client owns
+a lock on a Linux NFS server, which turned
+out to be specific to NFS v3 (which I really should have seen coming,
+since it involved NLM and lockd). Finding the NFS v4 client that
+owns a lock is, depending on your perspective, either simpl…<li><a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html#28-10-2023 target=_blank rel=noopener>October 28, 2023</a> — <a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html>Rob Landley's Blog Thing for 2023</a><div>Oh good grief, two of my least favorite licensing people, Larry Rosen
 and Bradley Kuhn, are interacting on the OSI's license-discuss
 list where the're doing
 bad computer history and insisting that a guy Larry Rosen
-- 
cgit v1.2.3