Updated theme

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/public/most-likely-to-succeed-in-year-of-2011.html b/public/most-likely-to-succeed-in-year-of-2011.html
index 68cecc3..4f76704 100755
--- a/public/most-likely-to-succeed-in-year-of-2011.html
+++ b/public/most-likely-to-succeed-in-year-of-2011.html
@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ Machine to mobile and vice versa. All the tech is available and ready to put
 into action. Wireless is today’s new mantra. And the concept of semantic web is
 now ready for industry.<p>Applications and developers now can gain access to new layers of systems and can
 prepare and build solutions to meet the high quality needs of market. The speed
-is everything now.<p>My vote goes to “Machine to Machine” and “Embedded Systems”!<ul><li><a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-to-Machine>Machine-to-Machine</a><li><a href=http://www.bitxml.org/>The ultimate M2M communication protocol</a><li><a href=http://www.coosproject.org/maven-site/1.0.0/project-info.html>COOS Project (connectivity initiative)</a><li><a href=http://m2m.com/index.jspa>Community for machine-to-machine</a><li><a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_system>Embedded system</a></ul></div></article></main><section><hr><h2>Posts from blogs I follow around the net</h2><ul><li><a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ZFSWhyNotDirectoryToFilesystem target=_blank rel=noopener>One reason that ZFS can't turn a directory into a filesystem</a> — <a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/>Chris's Wiki :: blog</a><div>One of the wishes that I and other people frequently have for ZFS
-is the ability to take an existing directory (and everything
-underneath it) in a ZFS filesystem and turn it into a sub-filesystem
-of its own. One reason for wanting this is that a number of things
-are set and controlled on a per-filesyst…<li><a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html#28-10-2023 target=_blank rel=noopener>October 28, 2023</a> — <a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html>Rob Landley's Blog Thing for 2023</a><div>Oh good grief, two of my least favorite licensing people, Larry Rosen
+is everything now.<p>My vote goes to “Machine to Machine” and “Embedded Systems”!<ul><li><a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-to-Machine>Machine-to-Machine</a><li><a href=http://www.bitxml.org/>The ultimate M2M communication protocol</a><li><a href=http://www.coosproject.org/maven-site/1.0.0/project-info.html>COOS Project (connectivity initiative)</a><li><a href=http://m2m.com/index.jspa>Community for machine-to-machine</a><li><a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_system>Embedded system</a></ul></div></article></main><section><hr><h2>Posts from blogs I follow around the net</h2><ul><li><a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/NFSv4ServerLockClients target=_blank rel=noopener>Finding which NFSv4 client owns a lock on a Linux NFS(v4) server</a> — <a href=https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/>Chris's Wiki :: blog</a><div>A while back I wrote an entry about finding which NFS client owns
+a lock on a Linux NFS server, which turned
+out to be specific to NFS v3 (which I really should have seen coming,
+since it involved NLM and lockd). Finding the NFS v4 client that
+owns a lock is, depending on your perspective, either simpl…<li><a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html#28-10-2023 target=_blank rel=noopener>October 28, 2023</a> — <a href=http://www.landley.net/notes-2023.html>Rob Landley's Blog Thing for 2023</a><div>Oh good grief, two of my least favorite licensing people, Larry Rosen
 and Bradley Kuhn, are interacting on the OSI's license-discuss
 list where the're doing
 bad computer history and insisting that a guy Larry Rosen