aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md')
-rw-r--r--_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md182
1 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md b/_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b9c1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_posts/posts/2015-11-10-software-development-pitfalls.md
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
1---
2title: Software development and my favorite pitfalls
3permalink: /software-development-pitfalls.html
4date: 2015-11-10T12:00:00+02:00
5layout: post
6type: post
7draft: false
8---
9
10Over the years I had the privilege to work on some very excited projects both in
11software development field and also in electronics field and every experience
12taught me some invaluable lessons about how NOT TO approach development. And
13through this post I will try to point out some absurd, outdated techniques I
14find the most annoying and damaging during a development cycle. There will be
15swearing because this topic really gets on my nerves and I never coherently
16tried to explain them in writing. So if I get heated up, please bear with me.
17
18As new methods of project management are emerging, underlying processes still
19stay old and outdated. This is mainly because we as people are unable to
20completely shift away from these approaches.
21
22I was always struggling with communication, and many times that cost me a
23relationship or two because I was not on the ball all the time. Through every
24experience, I became more convinced that I am the problem and never ever doubted
25that the problem may be that communication never evolved a single step from
26emails. And if you think for a second, not many things have changed around this
27topic. We just have different representations of email (message boards, chats,
28project management tools). And I believe this is the real issue we are facing
29now.
30
31There are many articles written about hyper connectivity and the effects that
32are a direct result of it. But mainstream does nothing towards it. We are just
33putting out fires, and we do nothing to prevent it. I am certain this will be a
34major source of grief in coming years. And what we all can do to avoid this is
35to change our mindset and experiment on our communication skills, development
36approaches. We need to maximize possible output that a person can give. And to
37achieve this we need to listen to them, encourage them. I know that not
38everybody is a naturally born leader, but with enough practice and encouragement
39they also can become active participants in leadership.
40
41There are many talks now about methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, Cleanroom
42and they all fucking piss me of :). These are all boxes that imprison people and
43take away their freedom of thought. This is a straightforward mindfuck /
44amputation of creativity.
45
46Let me list a couple of things that I find really destructive and bad for a
47project and in a long run company.
48
49## Ping emails
50
51Ping emails are emails you have to write as soon as you receive an email. Its
52sole purpose is to inform the sender that you received their email, and you are
53working on it. Its result is only to calm down the sender that their task is
54being dealt with. It’s intent basically is, I did my job by sending you this
55email, so I am on clear grounds. I categorize this email as fuck you email.
56This is one of the most irritating types of emails I need to write. This is the
57ultimate control freak show you can experience, and it gives the sender a false
58feeling of control. Newsflash: We do not live in 1982 where there was a
59possibility that email never reached the destination. I really hate this from
60the bottom of my heart.
61
62They should be like: “Yes, I am fucking alive, and I am at your service my
63leash!”. I guess if I would reply like this, I wouldn’t have to write any more
64of this kind of messages.
65
66## Everybody is a project manager
67
68Well, this is a tough one. I noticed that as soon as you let people to give
69their suggestions, you are basically screwed. There is a truth in the saying:
70“Give low expectations and deliver little more than you promised.”.
71
72People tend to take a role of a manager as soon as they are presented with an
73opportunity. And by getting angry at them, you only provoke yourself. They are
74not at fault. You just need to tell them they are only giving suggestions and
75not tasks at the beginning and everything will be alright. But if you give them
76a feeling that they are in control, you will have immense problems explaining
77why their features are not in current release.
78
79Project mission must be always leading project requirements and any deviation
80from it will result in major project butchering. And by this, I mean that the
81project will get its own path, and you will be left with half done software that
82helps nobody. Clear mission goals and clean execution will allow you to develop
83software will clear intent.
84
85## We are never wrong
86
87I find this type of arrogance the worst. We must always conduct ourselves that
88we are infallible and cannot make mistakes. As soon as a procedure or process is
89established, there is no room for changes or improvements. This is the most
90idiotic thing someone can say of think. I think that processes need to involve
91and change over time. This is imperative and need to have in your organization
92if you want to improve and develop company. We all need to grow balls and change
93everything in order to adapt to current situations. Being a prisoner of
94predefined processes kills creativity.
95
96I am constantly trying new software for project managing and communication. I
97believe every team has its own dynamic, and it needs to be discovered
98organically and naturally through many experiments. By putting the team in a
99box, you are amputating their creativity and therefore minimizing their
100potential. But if you talk to an executive, you will mainly find archetypical
101thinking and a strong need to compartmentalize everything from business
102processes to resource management. And this type of management that often
103displays micromanagement techniques only works for short periods (couple of
104years) and then employees either leave the company or become basically retarded
105drones on autopilot.
106
107## Micromanaging
108
109This basically implies that everybody on the team is an idiot who needs to have
110a to-do list that they cannot write themselves. How about spoon-feeding the team
111at launch because besides the team leader, everybody must be a retarded idiot at
112best?
113
114I prefer milestones as they give developers much more freedom and creativity in
115developing and not waste their time checking some bizarre to-do list that was
116not even thought through. Projects constantly change throughout the development
117cycle, and all you are left at the end is a list of unchecked tasks and the
118wrath of management why they are not completed. Best WTF moment!
119
120## Human contact — no need for it!
121
122We are vigorously trying to eliminate physical contact by replacing short
123meetings with software, with no regards that we are not machines. Many times a
124simple 5-min meeting at morning can solve most of the problems. In rapid
125development, short bursts of man to man communication is possibly the best way
126to go.
127
128We now have all this software available, and all what we get out of it is a
129giant clusterfuck. An obstacle and not a solution. So, why we still use them?
130
131## MVP is killing innovation
132
133Many will disagree with me on this one, but I stand strong by this statement.
134What I noticed in my experience that all this buzz words around us only mislead
135and capture us in a circle of solving issues that already have a solution, but
136we are unable to see it without using some fancy word for it.
137
138The toughest thing to do for a developer is to minimize requirements. Well, this
139is though only for bad developers. Yes, I said it. There are many types of
140developers out there. And those unable to minimize feature scope are the ones
141you don’t need on your team. Their only goal is to solve problems that exist
142only in their heads. And then you have to argue with them, and waste energy on
143them, instead of developing your awesome product. They are a cancer and I
144suggest you cut them off.
145
146MVP as an idea is great, but sadly people don’t understand underlying
147philosophy, and they spent too much time focusing and fixating on something that
148every sane person with normal IQ will understand without some made up
149acronym. And the result is a lot of talking and barely no execution.
150
151Well, MVP is not directly killing innovation, but stupid people do when they try
152to understand it.
153
154## Pressure wasteland
155
156You must never allow to be pressured into confirming a deadline if you are not
157confident. We often feel a need that we are in service of others, which is true
158to some extent. But it is also true that others are in service to us to some
159extent. And we forget this all the time. We are all pressured all the time to
160make decisions just to calm other people down. And when they leave your office
161you experience WTF moment :) How the hell did they manage to fuck me up again?
162
163People need to realize that the more pressure you put on somebody, the less they
164will be able to do. So 5-min update email requests will only resolve in mental
165breakdown and inability to work that day. Constant poking is probably the only
166thing I lose my mind instantly. For all you that are doing this: “Stop bothering
167us with your insecurities and let us do our job. We will do it quicker and
168better without you breathing down our necks.”
169
170If this happens to me, I end up with no energy at the end. Don’t you get it?
171You will get much more from and out of me if you ask me like a human person and
172not your personal butler. On a long run, you are destroying your relationships
173and nobody would want to work with you. Your schizophrenic approach will damage
174only you in a long run. Nobody is anybody’s property.
175
176## Conclusion
177
178I am guilty of many things described in this post. And I find it hard sometimes
179to acknowledge this. And I lie to myself and try vigorously to find some
180explanation why I do these things. There is always space for growth. And maybe
181you will also find some of yourself in this post and realize what needs to
182change for you to evolve.